The following is part of an interview between Ben Stein and Richard Dawkins.
"What do you think is the possibility that Intelligent Design might turn out to be the answer to some issues in genetics or in Darwinian evolution?"
"Well, it could come about in the following way. It could be that at some earlier time, somewhere in the universe, a civilization evolved, probably by some kind of Darwinian means, probably to a very high level of technology, and designed a form of life that they seeded onto perhaps this planet. Um, now that is a possibility, and an intriguing possibility. And I suppose it’s possible that you might find evidence for that if you look at the details of biochemistry, molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer. And that Designer could well be a higher intelligence from elsewhere in the universe. But that higher intelligence would itself have had to have come about by some explicable, or ultimately explicable process. It couldn't have just jumped into existence spontaneously. That's the point."
This huge concession should cause Dawkins to stop complaining about the concept of the biblical Creator God. He has stated he is prepared to seriously consider the possibility that an intelligent, extremely highly evolved being could exist; a designer capable of creating molecular biology and seeding it onto another planet. As so often with Richard Dawkins he appears to propose ideas and solutions without ever thinking them through.
In this case he first contemplates this hypothetical ET and then seeks to define exactly how it must have come to exist. He does so on the basis of a theory which he cannot support with evidence at the level of origins. He had earlier in the interview admitted that no-
He also knows there can be no evolution prior to the existence of a universe and no evolutionary processes until the first self-
Has the following ever occurred to him? This purpose built Dawkins E.T. was able to both engage in inter planetary travel and seed life on earth. He therefore attributes great power, almost divine in the biblical sense to this unknown designer. Has he faced the logical consequences of his statement quoted above?
Because God is by biblical definition Extra-
|The Big Question of Life, Universe & Everything
|Did it all start with a Big Bang?
|What about the Dinosaurs
|Looking at your Family Album
|Fossil Record - Missing Links still Missing!
|What about Dating?
|Devolving NOT Evolving!
|Intelligent Design or Common Ancestor?
|Geology - How old actually are the Hills?
|Is God a Realistic Option?
|Why is all this so important?
|Creative Creation Tales
|In a Nutshell - What's it all about?
|The Gospel through Art
|The Big Issue
|Darwin's Theory of Evolution: What is it?
|The Fact of Evolution
|Why is Nothing Simple?
|It came from outer space
|Loss of Logic
|Is the Earth near Centre of the Universe
|Dissident Big Bang Scientists
|Find the Lady
|Roman Catholic Creationist Scientists
|Geology of the Earth
|Evolution: It's against the Law
|Fossils at Sharktooth Bone Bed
|Rocking the Boat
|Evolution of an Idea
|Built on Rock Websites
|Christian Flash Mobs
|Genesis 3D Movie
|Dinosaurs for Dummies
|Richard Dawkins - What if?
|More to Life
|About Built on Rock
|Book a Talk