A Built on Rock Website
Home Key Points Artwork Articles Resources Contact Events

Home     Key Points     Artwork     Articles     Resources      Contact     Events

About Built on Rock     Useful Links     Book a Talk

Built on Rock Websites


Dinosaurs for Dummies                                  Richard Dawkins                                                   More To Life

Built on Rock ! Exploring Answers to Questions about Life, The Universe & Everything

This letter quoted below has nothing whatsoever to do with Creationism. As far as I know these scientists are secular in their thinking and have no sympathy with any of the ideas expressed on the Built on Rock Websites.

However, what is apparent is that Big Bang theory is clearly not universally accepted by scientists. This is primarily due to the many massive fudge factors and the existence of other viable alternatives.

Creationists are routinely derided for making the claim that their scientists are excluded from the debate, not allowed to publish in peer reviewed scientific publications and have little to no chance of major funding for research projects. The strange thing is that the 220 scientists listed below (following the conclusion of the letter) make exactly the same complaints. When a dominant theory exists it tends to crush all opposition and demean every alternative, regardless of whether that alternative is secular or religious. Theories such as Darwinism and the Big Bang theory leave little but crumbs left over from the media feeding frenzies which follow the release of each and every communication; and these arise only from among recognised and authorised experts. Anything else is usually ignored or ridiculed.

.................................................

An Open Letter to the Scientific Community

Cosmologystatement.org (Published in New Scientist, May 22, 2004)


The big bang today relies on a growing number of hypothetical entities, things that we have never observed-- inflation, dark matter and dark energy are the most prominent examples. Without them, there would be a fatal contradiction between the observations made by astronomers and the predictions of the big bang theory. In no other field of physics would this continual recourse to new hypothetical objects be accepted as a way of bridging the gap between theory and observation. It would, at the least, raise serious questions about the validity of the underlying theory.

But the big bang theory can't survive without these fudge factors. Without the hypothetical inflation field, the big bang does not predict the smooth, isotropic cosmic background radiation that is observed, because there would be no way for parts of the universe that are now more than a few degrees away in the sky to come to the same temperature and thus emit the same amount of microwave radiation.

Without some kind of dark matter, unlike any that we have observed on Earth despite 20 years of experiments, big-bang theory makes contradictory predictions for the density of matter in the universe. Inflation requires a density 20 times larger than that implied by big bang nucleosynthesis, the theory's explanation of the origin of the light elements. And without dark energy, the theory predicts that the universe is only about 8 billion years old, which is billions of years younger than the age of many stars in our galaxy.

What is more, the big bang theory can boast of no quantitative predictions that have subsequently been validated by observation. The successes claimed by the theory's supporters consist of its ability to retrospectively fit observations with a steadily increasing array of adjustable parameters, just as the old Earth-centered cosmology of Ptolemy needed layer upon layer of epicycles.

Yet the big bang is not the only framework available for understanding the history of the universe. Plasma cosmology and the steady-state model both hypothesize an evolving universe without beginning or end. These and other alternative approaches can also explain the basic phenomena of the cosmos, including the abundances of light elements, the generation of large-scale structure, the cosmic background radiation, and how the redshift of far-away galaxies increases with distance. They have even predicted new phenomena that were subsequently observed, something the big bang has failed to do.

Supporters of the big bang theory may retort that these theories do not explain every cosmological observation. But that is scarcely surprising, as their development has been severely hampered by a complete lack of funding. Indeed, such questions and alternatives cannot even now be freely discussed and examined. An open exchange of ideas is lacking in most mainstream conferences. Whereas Richard Feynman could say that "science is the culture of doubt", in cosmology today doubt and dissent are not tolerated, and young scientists learn to remain silent if they have something negative to say about the standard big bang model. Those who doubt the big bang fear that saying so will cost them their funding.

Even observations are now interpreted through this biased filter, judged right or wrong depending on whether or not they support the big bang. So discordant data on red shifts, lithium and helium abundances, and galaxy distribution, among other topics, are ignored or ridiculed. This reflects a growing dogmatic mindset that is alien to the spirit of free scientific inquiry.

Today, virtually all financial and experimental resources in cosmology are devoted to big bang studies. Funding comes from only a few sources, and all the peer-review committees that control them are dominated by supporters of the big bang. As a result, the dominance of the big bang within the field has become self-sustaining, irrespective of the scientific validity of the theory.

Giving support only to projects within the big bang framework undermines a fundamental element of the scientific method -- the constant testing of theory against observation. Such a restriction makes unbiased discussion and research impossible. To redress this, we urge those agencies that fund work in cosmology to set aside a significant fraction of their funding for investigations into alternative theories and observational contradictions of the big bang. To avoid bias, the peer review committee that allocates such funds could be composed of astronomers and physicists from outside the field of cosmology.

Allocating funding to investigations into the big bang's validity, and its alternatives, would allow the scientific process to determine our most accurate model of the history of the universe.

Original Signers   |  Scientists and Engineers  |  Independent Researchers  |  Other Signers

Signed:

(Institutions for identification only)


Halton Arp, Max-Planck-Institute Fur Astrophysik (Germany)

Andre Koch Torres Assis, State University of Campinas (Brazil)

Yuri Baryshev, Astronomical Institute, St. Petersburg State University (Russia)

Ari Brynjolfsson, Applied Radiation Industries (USA)

Hermann Bondi, Churchill College, University of Cambridge (UK)

Timothy Eastman, Plasmas International (USA)

Chuck Gallo, Superconix, Inc.(USA)

Thomas Gold, Cornell University (emeritus) (USA)

Amitabha Ghosh, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur (India)

Walter J. Heikkila, University of Texas at Dallas (USA)     ................................................. 10

Michael Ibison, Institute for Advanced Studies at Austin (USA)

Thomas Jarboe, University of Washington (USA)

Jerry W. Jensen, ATK Propulsion (USA)

Menas Kafatos, George Mason University (USA)

Eric J. Lerner, Lawrenceville Plasma Physics (USA)

Paul Marmet, Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics (retired) (Canada)

Paola Marziani, Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica, Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova (Italy)

Gregory Meholic, The Aerospace Corporation (USA)

Jacques Moret-Bailly, Université Dijon (retired) (France)

Jayant Narlikar, IUCAA(emeritus) and College de France (India, France)    ........................ 20

Marcos Cesar Danhoni Neves, State University of Maringá (Brazil)

Charles D. Orth, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (USA)

R. David Pace, Lyon College (USA)

Georges Paturel, Observatoire de Lyon (France)

Jean-Claude Pecker, College de France (France)

Anthony L. Peratt, Los Alamos National Laboratory (USA)

Bill Peter, BAE Systems Advanced Technologies (USA)

David Roscoe, Sheffield University (UK)

Malabika Roy, George Mason University (USA)

Sisir Roy, George Mason University (USA)     .................................................................... 30

Konrad Rudnicki, Jagiellonian University (Poland)

Domingos S.L. Soares, Federal University of Minas Gerais (Brazil)

John L. West, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology (USA)

James F. Woodward, California State University, Fullerton (USA)

New signers of the Open letter since publication


Scientists and Engineers


Jorge Marao Universidade Estadual de Londrina Brazi

Martin John Baker, Loretto School Musselburgh, UK

Peter J Carroll,  Psychonaut Institute, UK

Roger Y. Gouin, Ecole Superieure d'Electricite, France

John Murray, Sunyata Composite Ltd, UK

Jonathan Chambers, University of Sheffield, UK    ................................................................. 40

Michel  A.  Duguay, Laval University, Canada

Qi Pan, Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge, UK

Fred Rost, University of NSW (Emeritus), Australia

Louis Hissink, Consulting Geologist, Australia

Hetu Sheth, Earth Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, India

Lassi Hyvärinen, IBM(Ret), France

Max Whisson, University of Melbourne, Australia

R.S.Griffiths, CADAS, UK

Adolf Muenker, Brane Industries, USA

Emre Isik    Akdeniz University    Turkey    .................................. 50

Felipe de Oliveira Alves, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil

Jean-Marc Bonnet-Bidaud, Service d'Astrophysique, CEA, France

Kim George, Curtin University of Technology, Australia

Tom Van Flandern, Meta Research, USA

Doneley Watson, IBM (ret.), USA

Fred Alan Wolf, Have Brains / Will Travel, USA

Robert Wood, IEEE, Canada

D. W. Harris, L-3 Communications, USA

Eugene Sittampalam, Engineering consultant, Sri Lanka

Joseph.B. Krieger, Brooklyn College, CUNY, USA   ............................................................ 60

Pablo Vasquez, New Jersey Institute of Technology, USA

Peter F. Richiuso, NASA, KSC, USA

Roger A. Rydin, University of Virginia (Emeritus), USA

Stefan Rydstrom, Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden

Sylvan J. Hotch, The MITRE Corporation (Retired), USA

Thomas R. Love, CSU Dominguez Hills, USA

Andrew Coles, Embedded Systems, USA

Eit Gaastra, infinite universe researcher,  The Netherlands

Franco Selleri, Università di Bari, Dipartimento di Fisica, Italy

Gerald Pease, The Aerospace Corporation, USA    .............................................................. 70

S.N. Arteha, Space Research Institute, Russia

Miroslaw Kozlowski, Warsaw University (emeritus), Poland

John Hartnett, School of Physics, University of Western Australia, Australia

Robert Zubrin, Pioneer Astronautics, USA

Tibor Gasparik, SUNY at Stony Brook, USA

Alexandre Losev, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bulgaria

Henry Hall, University of Manchester, UK

José da Silva, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil

Markus Rohner, Griesser AG, Switzerland

William C. Mitchell, Institute for Advanced Cosmological Studies, USA    ............................. 80

Aurea Garcia-Rissmann, UFSC, Brazil

Cristian R. Ghezzi, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil

Daniel Nicolato Epitácio Pereira, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Gregory M. Salyards, US Naval Sea Systems Command (ret.), USA

Luiz Carlos Barbosa, Unicamp, Brazil

Luiz Carlos Jafelice,  Federal University of the Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil

Michael Sosteric, Athabasca University, Canada

Steven Langley Guy, University of Elizabeth (Physics Department), Australia

Robert Fritzius, Shade Tree Physics, USA

Irineu Gomes Varella, Escola Municipal de Astrofísica, Brazil    ............................................... 90

Tom Walther, Southern Cross University Australia , Australia

Mauro Cosentino, University of São Paulo, Brazil

Moacir Lacerda, Univeersidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil

Roberto Assumpcao, PUC Minas, Brazil

Roberto Lopes Parra, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil

Ronaldo Junio Camppos Batista, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil

Ermenegildo Caccese, University of Basilicata, Italy

Felipe Sofia Zanuzzo, Federal University of São Carlos, Brazil

Edival de Morais, Sociedade Brasileira de Física,  Brazil

Graham Coupe, KAZ Technology Services, Australia     ....................................................... 100

Gordon Petrie, High Altitude Observatory, NCAR, USA,

Jose B. Almeida, University of Minho, Portugal,

Antonio Cleiton, Laboratório de Sistemas Complexos - UFPI, Brazil

Sergey Karpov, L.V.Kirensky Institute of Physics  Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia

Wagner Patrick Junqueira de Souza Coelho Nicácio, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil

Sokolov Vladimir, Special Astrophysical Observatory  of  RAS, Russia

Edwin G. Schasteen, TAP-TEN Research Foundation International, USA

Gerry Zeitlin, openseti.org, USA

Henry H. Bauer, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, USA

Yasha Fard,H.R. Cosmology Institute, Canada     .................................................................. 110

Roberto Caimmi, Astronomy Department, Padua University, Italy

Tobias Keller, ETH (SFIT) Zurich, Earth Sciences,   Switzerland,

Deborah Foch, Center for the Study of Extraterrestrial Intelligence, USA,

Henry Reynolds, UC Santa Cruz, USA,

Paramahamsa Tewari, Nuclear Power Corporation (ret.),India

Jouko Seppänen, Helsinki University of Technology, Finland,

Cristiane Ribeiro Bernardes, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil

Eric Blievernicht. TRW,  USA

Dr. Robert Bennett, Kolbe Center, USA,

Hilton Ratcliffe, Astronomical Society of South Africa, South Africa   ....................................... 120

Wieslaw  Sztumski, Silesian University, Poland

Lars Wåhlin,Colutron Research Corporation,USA

Riccardo Scarpa, European Southern Observatory, Italy,

Olivier Marco, European Southern Observatory,   France

Joseph Garcia, International Radiation Protection, Germany,

Arkadiusz Jadczyk, International Institute of Mathematical Physics, Lithuania

Jean de Pontcharra, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, France

Gerardus D. Bouw, Baldwin-Wallace College,  USA

Josef Lutz, Chemnitz University of Technology, Germany,

Harold E. Puthoff, Institute for Advanced Studies at Austin, USA.   .......................................... 130

Hermann Dürkop, Nabla Systemberatung,  Germany,

Klaus Fischer, Universität Trier, Germany,

Werner Holzmüller, University Leipzig, Germany

Sol Aisenberg, International Technology Group, USA

Richard Gancarczyk, University of Nottingham, UK

Steve Humphry, Murdoch University, Australia

Alberto Bolognesi, Università di Perugia, Italy

Daniele Carosati, Armenzano Observatory, Italy

Brendan Dean, H.R. Cosmology Institute, Canada

W. Jim Jastrzebski, Warsaw University, Poland   .................................................. 140

Gero Rupprecht, European Southern Observatory, Germany

Rainer Herrmann    TEWS-Elektronik    Germany         

Felix Pharand    University of Montreal Canada

Jerry Bergman    Northwest State University     USA        

Tibor Gasparik    SUNY at Stony Brook  USA         

Rei Gunn    University of Nantucket     USA

Sinan Alis    Eyuboglu Twin Observatories    Turkey

Esat Rennan Pekünlü    University of EGE Turkey         

Anne M. Hofmeister     Washington U.  USA

Quentin Foreman  IEEE  New Zealand   .................................................................... 150

Marc Berndl  University of Toronto  Canada

Y. P. Varshni  University of Ottawa   Canada

Robert Martinek  McMaster University  Canada

Bob Criss  Washington University  USA

Sol Aisenberg, International Technology Group, USA

Paul LaViolette, The Starburst Foundation, U.S.A.

Seetesh Pandé, Universite Claude Bernard, Lyon France

TAHIR MAQSOOD, PSA, PAKISTAN

Hartmut Traunmüller, University of Stockholm, Sweden    ..................................................... 160

Nico F. Benschop, Amspade Research, Netherlands

Aaron Blake, USAF, USA     

M. Ross Fergus, University of Memphis, USA

Sonu Bhaskar, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India

Frederico V. F., Lima Universidade de Sao Paulo, Brazil

Andrei Kirilyuk,  Institute of Metal Physics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine

Christian Jooss, Institut fuer Materialphysik, University of Goettingen, Germany

Sonu Bhaskar, BCISR, India

Robert O. Myers, ROM Technologies, USA

Ana Cristina Oliveira, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil   ..................................... 170

John Wey, Idaho National Laboratory, USA

Jorge Francisco Maldonado Serrano, UIS, Colombia

Pasquale Galianni, Dipartimento di Fisica Università di Lecce, Italy

Martín López-Corredoira, Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, Spain

Michael A. Ivanov, Belarus State University of Informatics and Radioelectronics, Belarus

Xiao Jianhua , Shanghai Jiaotong University, China

Pierre J. Beaujon, Hoornbeeck College, The Netherlands

J.Georg von Brzeski Helios Labs. USA

vidyardhi nanduri , Cosmology Research center , India

 Mike Rotch NBSA USA   ....................................................... 180

Paul Noel, Independent_Researcher, USA

Swee Eng, AW Royal College of Pathologists, SINGAPORE

Ricardo Rodríguez , La Laguna University , Spain

Linda Camp Harvard University USA

James B. Schwartz , The Noah's Ark Research Foundation , Philippines

Marshall Douglas Smith , TeddySpeaks Foundation ,USA

Abbé Grumel , Association Copernic , France

Ives van Leth Waterboard Utrecht The Netherlands

Francis Michael C. Perez, Department of Transportation, USA

AHMED A. EL-DASH UNICAMP BRAZIL    ................................................... 190

David C Ware, University of Auckland, New Zealand

Alek Atevik, Skopje Astronomy Society, Macedonia

Peter Rowlands, University of Liverpool, UK

Robert Day, Suntola Consulting, Ltd., USA

Luís Paulo Sousa Loureiro, Portugal

Maingot Fabrice, Université Louis Pasteur, France

Kris Krogh, University of California, USA

Pierre-Marie Robitaille, The Ohio State University, United States

Charles Creager Jr, Creation Research Society, United States

Stephan Gift, The University of the West Indies, St Augustine Campus, Trinidad and Tobago ... 200

Joseph J. Smulsky, Institute of Earth's Cryosphere Siberian Branch Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia

Jorge Marao Universidade Estadual de Londrina Brazil

Jim O'Reilly Orion Consultants USA

Robert MacKay University of Warwick UK     

Chris Vermeulen Astronomical Society of Southern Africa South Africa

Emilson Pereira Leite Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics Brazil

Allen W Green ATK Space Systems USA

Ron Balsys Central Queensland University Australia

Paul ten Boom University of New South Wales Australia

Mosheh Thezion The Empirical Church, USA    .......................................... 210

Markus, Karsten,, Wilhelm-Foerster-Observatory Berlin e.V

Don. C. Wilson,: Process Technology and Development, USA

Marek Gajewski, Raytheon Co.,USA

Tuncay DOGAN, University of EGE, Turkey    

Andrew M Uhl, Pennsylvania State Univeristy, USA

Klaus Wieder, Independent_Researcher, Germany

John Caley, Omegafour Pty Ltd, Australia

Keith Scott-Mumby, Capital University for Integrative Medicine/California

Institute for Human Sciences, USA  

….......................................

It is worth pointing out that those prepared to sign any kind of protest letter are normally just a small percentage of those who feel strongly about whatever subject is under consideration. These 220 signatories could be just the tip of an iceberg of discontent.

Big Bang…Dissident Scientists…Loads of Them!